<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introducing the Amazing, Wonderful and Completely Magnificent Microsoft the Magician&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/03/introducing-the-amazing-wonderful-and-completely-magnificent-microsoft-the-magician/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/03/introducing-the-amazing-wonderful-and-completely-magnificent-microsoft-the-magician/</link>
	<description>Sharing my thoughts with the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 02:58:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: -: A Random View of an Insecure World : &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Severity of Vulnerabilities</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/03/introducing-the-amazing-wonderful-and-completely-magnificent-microsoft-the-magician/comment-page-1/#comment-4693</link>
		<dc:creator>-: A Random View of an Insecure World : &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Severity of Vulnerabilities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 04:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=287#comment-4693</guid>
		<description>[...] Personally, I&#8217;m all for the lowering of vulnerability severities if there is some reason to. However, I am a little concerned about how often people are trying to do this lately for their own reasons/benefits. With my post on the OpenBSD vulnerability snafu here, the fact that Microsoft is planning to only put DoS vulnerabilities in Service Packs, plus the Microsoft example here, I fear that people are becoming a little too used to bad things not happening anymore. Admittedly, things have been all quiet on the worm front lately, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that something won&#8217;t happen tomorrow. Trying to lower the severity of dangerous vulnerabilities does nothing but facilitate the ignorance of those who heavily rely on them. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Personally, I&#8217;m all for the lowering of vulnerability severities if there is some reason to. However, I am a little concerned about how often people are trying to do this lately for their own reasons/benefits. With my post on the OpenBSD vulnerability snafu here, the fact that Microsoft is planning to only put DoS vulnerabilities in Service Packs, plus the Microsoft example here, I fear that people are becoming a little too used to bad things not happening anymore. Admittedly, things have been all quiet on the worm front lately, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that something won&#8217;t happen tomorrow. Trying to lower the severity of dangerous vulnerabilities does nothing but facilitate the ignorance of those who heavily rely on them. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

