<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Odds and Ends</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/03/odds-and-ends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/03/odds-and-ends/</link>
	<description>Sharing my thoughts with the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 02:58:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: -: A Random View of an Insecure World : &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Top 59 Influencers in IT Security</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/03/odds-and-ends/comment-page-1/#comment-4592</link>
		<dc:creator>-: A Random View of an Insecure World : &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Top 59 Influencers in IT Security</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 04:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=289#comment-4592</guid>
		<description>[...] Yes, it&#8217;s gotten a lot of press already and there are a lot of people who disagree with the original list. It looks like someone took the roster from the Security Blogger Meetup at RSA, made it into a list and did some random rankings to make it look official. There are some glaring omissions (as Thomas mentions on the Matasano blog) of people who I&#8217;d argue are very influential in the security industry today. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yes, it&#8217;s gotten a lot of press already and there are a lot of people who disagree with the original list. It looks like someone took the roster from the Security Blogger Meetup at RSA, made it into a list and did some random rankings to make it look official. There are some glaring omissions (as Thomas mentions on the Matasano blog) of people who I&#8217;d argue are very influential in the security industry today. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LonerVamp</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/03/odds-and-ends/comment-page-1/#comment-4567</link>
		<dc:creator>LonerVamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=289#comment-4567</guid>
		<description>I started in on it, but have not gotten around to decoding the string that one of the listening ports responds with. Been a busy week, sadly.

Winny both impresses and annoys me. It is impressive how such a small tool can do such big things. And it annoys me that such a small tool can do such big things. Puts the futility of some security ideas and initiatives into perspective. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started in on it, but have not gotten around to decoding the string that one of the listening ports responds with. Been a busy week, sadly.</p>
<p>Winny both impresses and annoys me. It is impressive how such a small tool can do such big things. And it annoys me that such a small tool can do such big things. Puts the futility of some security ideas and initiatives into perspective. <img src='http://www.computerdefense.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Reguly</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/03/odds-and-ends/comment-page-1/#comment-4551</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Reguly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 06:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=289#comment-4551</guid>
		<description>Corrine, 

You&#039;ll be happy to know that Ryan (from numerophobe.com) and myself are redoing the list and will be releasing what we consider to be an actual Top XX List.. 

LonerVamp,

Thanks for the history... btw how are ya coming on the VERT Challenge.. did you put anything together?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corrine, </p>
<p>You&#8217;ll be happy to know that Ryan (from numerophobe.com) and myself are redoing the list and will be releasing what we consider to be an actual Top XX List.. </p>
<p>LonerVamp,</p>
<p>Thanks for the history&#8230; btw how are ya coming on the VERT Challenge.. did you put anything together?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LonerVamp</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/03/odds-and-ends/comment-page-1/#comment-4532</link>
		<dc:creator>LonerVamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=289#comment-4532</guid>
		<description>That list has been out a while now, but it was &quot;rebranded&quot; to be that top 59 whatever list. Previously it was just someone&#039;s list of sites that were on that site. And yes, Fyodor was mispelled then too. :)

Of note, if you actually read closely on the snippets, it becomes very curious whether the author even reads some of them or knows them at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That list has been out a while now, but it was &#8220;rebranded&#8221; to be that top 59 whatever list. Previously it was just someone&#8217;s list of sites that were on that site. And yes, Fyodor was mispelled then too. <img src='http://www.computerdefense.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Of note, if you actually read closely on the snippets, it becomes very curious whether the author even reads some of them or knows them at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corrine</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/03/odds-and-ends/comment-page-1/#comment-4514</link>
		<dc:creator>Corrine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=289#comment-4514</guid>
		<description>&quot;I may release what I consider to be a more accurate list in the near future.&quot;

Yes, please do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I may release what I consider to be a more accurate list in the near future.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, please do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

