<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mailing List Information Leakage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/09/mailing-list-information-leakage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/09/mailing-list-information-leakage/</link>
	<description>Sharing my thoughts with the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 02:58:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/09/mailing-list-information-leakage/comment-page-1/#comment-77441</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=383#comment-77441</guid>
		<description>The company I work for (&gt;50k employees) has rules in the Exchange servers to disallow any automatic replies to addresses outside the corporate mail network. This is for both Out of Office replies and rule-based responses. 

It&#039;s very effective at stopping those sorts of leaks of confidential/non-public information. It&#039;s quite annoying sometimes though when a vendor is emailing you asking for information/input. you&#039;re away on holidays, and they think you&#039;re being rude. There&#039;s no end-user accessible &#039;white list&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The company I work for (&amp;gt;50k employees) has rules in the Exchange servers to disallow any automatic replies to addresses outside the corporate mail network. This is for both Out of Office replies and rule-based responses. </p>
<p>It&#039;s very effective at stopping those sorts of leaks of confidential/non-public information. It&#039;s quite annoying sometimes though when a vendor is emailing you asking for information/input. you&#039;re away on holidays, and they think you&#039;re being rude. There&#039;s no end-user accessible &#039;white list&#039;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/09/mailing-list-information-leakage/comment-page-1/#comment-24815</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 04:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=383#comment-24815</guid>
		<description>The company I work for (&gt;50k employees) has rules in the Exchange servers to disallow any automatic replies to addresses outside the corporate mail network. This is for both Out of Office replies and rule-based responses. 

It&#039;s very effective at stopping those sorts of leaks of confidential/non-public information. It&#039;s quite annoying sometimes though when a vendor is emailing you asking for information/input. you&#039;re away on holidays, and they think you&#039;re being rude. There&#039;s no end-user accessible &#039;white list&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The company I work for (&gt;50k employees) has rules in the Exchange servers to disallow any automatic replies to addresses outside the corporate mail network. This is for both Out of Office replies and rule-based responses. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s very effective at stopping those sorts of leaks of confidential/non-public information. It&#8217;s quite annoying sometimes though when a vendor is emailing you asking for information/input. you&#8217;re away on holidays, and they think you&#8217;re being rude. There&#8217;s no end-user accessible &#8216;white list&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

