<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sulley Fuzzing Framework</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/10/sulley-fuzzing-framework/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/10/sulley-fuzzing-framework/</link>
	<description>Sharing my thoughts with the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 02:58:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bugfree</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/10/sulley-fuzzing-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-31567</link>
		<dc:creator>bugfree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 15:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=400#comment-31567</guid>
		<description>Interesting to know there is a fuzzing mail list. From the presentation of blackhat, it should be a little complex to setup a full fuzzing environment. Fuzzing engine is just one component of it. I always wonder Sulley can fully replace fuzzing tool like Spike or Peach or not in the near future. The concept/idea is beautiful, but it need time to prove its efficiency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to know there is a fuzzing mail list. From the presentation of blackhat, it should be a little complex to setup a full fuzzing environment. Fuzzing engine is just one component of it. I always wonder Sulley can fully replace fuzzing tool like Spike or Peach or not in the near future. The concept/idea is beautiful, but it need time to prove its efficiency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

