<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google + Tor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/11/google-tor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/11/google-tor/</link>
	<description>Sharing my thoughts with the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 02:58:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/11/google-tor/comment-page-1/#comment-193999</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 02:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=428#comment-193999</guid>
		<description>This is old news and nonsense. 

For pete&#039;s sakes....Tor is working WITH Google now!! So much for &#039;anonymity&#039; being a primary goal LOL In fact, Google is FUNDING Tor. Check out the Tor website if you don&#039;t believe me.

re: &#039;Google&#039;s summer of code&#039; exercise

At the end of the day, they all sell out for $$$

Tor says they wouldn&#039;t have only if more propellor heads had volunteered to help them out but since they didn&#039;t, they are taking money from Google.

Google knows how to dominate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is old news and nonsense. </p>
<p>For pete&#8217;s sakes&#8230;.Tor is working WITH Google now!! So much for &#8216;anonymity&#8217; being a primary goal LOL In fact, Google is FUNDING Tor. Check out the Tor website if you don&#8217;t believe me.</p>
<p>re: &#8216;Google&#8217;s summer of code&#8217; exercise</p>
<p>At the end of the day, they all sell out for $$$</p>
<p>Tor says they wouldn&#8217;t have only if more propellor heads had volunteered to help them out but since they didn&#8217;t, they are taking money from Google.</p>
<p>Google knows how to dominate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/11/google-tor/comment-page-1/#comment-160354</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 06:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=428#comment-160354</guid>
		<description>True.It seems Google doesn&#039;t like Tor and blocks it(not some of the time but) all the time.Alex </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True.It seems Google doesn&#39;t like Tor and blocks it(not some of the time but) all the time.Alex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: one who reads the fa</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/11/google-tor/comment-page-1/#comment-77435</link>
		<dc:creator>one who reads the fa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=428#comment-77435</guid>
		<description>&quot;To our knowledge, Google is not doing anything intentionally specifically to deter or block Tor use. The error message about an infected machine should clear up again after a short time.&quot;

http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#GoogleSpyware</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;To our knowledge, Google is not doing anything intentionally specifically to deter or block Tor use. The error message about an infected machine should clear up again after a short time.&quot;</p>
<p><a href="http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#GoogleSpyware" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#GoogleSpyware</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speaker to animals</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/11/google-tor/comment-page-1/#comment-74684</link>
		<dc:creator>Speaker to animals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=428#comment-74684</guid>
		<description>i just love seeing the google ads along the page as i read the comments. yup google still going strong w/ 403. Bastards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just love seeing the google ads along the page as i read the comments. yup google still going strong w/ 403. Bastards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/11/google-tor/comment-page-1/#comment-66978</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=428#comment-66978</guid>
		<description>I hate to say it but Google is not a fan of TOR because they can&#039;t gather information on your computer while you are using TOR and an annonimous proxy.   Haven&#039;t you figure out that Google is into snooping your business too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to say it but Google is not a fan of TOR because they can&#8217;t gather information on your computer while you are using TOR and an annonimous proxy.   Haven&#8217;t you figure out that Google is into snooping your business too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: one who reads the faq</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/11/google-tor/comment-page-1/#comment-38688</link>
		<dc:creator>one who reads the faq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=428#comment-38688</guid>
		<description>&quot;To our knowledge, Google is not doing anything intentionally specifically to deter or block Tor use. The error message about an infected machine should clear up again after a short time.&quot;

http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#GoogleSpyware</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;To our knowledge, Google is not doing anything intentionally specifically to deter or block Tor use. The error message about an infected machine should clear up again after a short time.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#GoogleSpyware" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#GoogleSpyware</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nil0lab</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/11/google-tor/comment-page-1/#comment-38016</link>
		<dc:creator>nil0lab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 05:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=428#comment-38016</guid>
		<description>It may also have to do with privoxy sanitizing the request and google not getting the (excessive amount of) data a browser usually gives them with a request (referrer, os, etc.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may also have to do with privoxy sanitizing the request and google not getting the (excessive amount of) data a browser usually gives them with a request (referrer, os, etc.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Reguly</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/11/google-tor/comment-page-1/#comment-37532</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Reguly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=428#comment-37532</guid>
		<description>I agree that Google is most likely blocking the IPs because of automated scanning by someone via Tor... however I still think at some point they are blacklisting the exit points permanently...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Google is most likely blocking the IPs because of automated scanning by someone via Tor&#8230; however I still think at some point they are blacklisting the exit points permanently&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ero Carrera</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/11/google-tor/comment-page-1/#comment-37518</link>
		<dc:creator>Ero Carrera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=428#comment-37518</guid>
		<description>I vote for the hypothesis that they are just blocking it because of too many queries coming out of those IPs... maybe they blacklist them once they go beyond certain threshold (hence the missing CAPTCHA as well). I&#039;ve been playing with &quot;unofficial&quot; query automation (i.e. not using Google API) and doesn&#039;t really take much to upset their automation detection algorithms... it&#039;s enough with a few queries fast enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I vote for the hypothesis that they are just blocking it because of too many queries coming out of those IPs&#8230; maybe they blacklist them once they go beyond certain threshold (hence the missing CAPTCHA as well). I&#8217;ve been playing with &#8220;unofficial&#8221; query automation (i.e. not using Google API) and doesn&#8217;t really take much to upset their automation detection algorithms&#8230; it&#8217;s enough with a few queries fast enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jibbler</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/11/google-tor/comment-page-1/#comment-37512</link>
		<dc:creator>Jibbler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=428#comment-37512</guid>
		<description>Are you sure this has anything to do with Tor?  That looks like the standard error you get from Google if you appear to be doing lots of automated queries.  Bearing in mind how many other clients (humans and bots) are likely to be using the same Tor exit node, that is not a surprising phenomonon. I doubt Google are explicitly blocking use of Tor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure this has anything to do with Tor?  That looks like the standard error you get from Google if you appear to be doing lots of automated queries.  Bearing in mind how many other clients (humans and bots) are likely to be using the same Tor exit node, that is not a surprising phenomonon. I doubt Google are explicitly blocking use of Tor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

