<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Has SANS Top 20 Lost All Meaning?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/11/has-sans-top-20-lost-all-meaning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/11/has-sans-top-20-lost-all-meaning/</link>
	<description>Sharing my thoughts with the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 04:08:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: LonerVamp</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/11/has-sans-top-20-lost-all-meaning/comment-page-1/#comment-37779</link>
		<dc:creator>LonerVamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=430#comment-37779</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s almost prophetic...everyone and everything is a risk. I&#039;m sure non-sec people will see this as a step backwards and we&#039;re not making any progress whatsoever. I think this is a step forwards in getting non-sec people who might be referencing this to realize we won&#039;t ever &quot;win&quot; totally. As long as technology and software and people are innumerable, the issues are innumerable...

But no, I don&#039;t see as much meaning in the list this year. It&#039;s a nice, fairly short means to sample our daily lives (detailing the top 20 would take several books otherwise!), but it otherwise gives me nothing new in either knowledge or actionable items.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s almost prophetic&#8230;everyone and everything is a risk. I&#8217;m sure non-sec people will see this as a step backwards and we&#8217;re not making any progress whatsoever. I think this is a step forwards in getting non-sec people who might be referencing this to realize we won&#8217;t ever &#8220;win&#8221; totally. As long as technology and software and people are innumerable, the issues are innumerable&#8230;</p>
<p>But no, I don&#8217;t see as much meaning in the list this year. It&#8217;s a nice, fairly short means to sample our daily lives (detailing the top 20 would take several books otherwise!), but it otherwise gives me nothing new in either knowledge or actionable items.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
