<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: [SecTor Review] Black Ops 2007: DNS Rebinding Attacks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/11/sector-review-black-ops-2007-dns-rebinding-attacks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/11/sector-review-black-ops-2007-dns-rebinding-attacks/</link>
	<description>Sharing my thoughts with the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 02:58:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Reguly</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/11/sector-review-black-ops-2007-dns-rebinding-attacks/comment-page-1/#comment-37406</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Reguly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=423#comment-37406</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right... re-writing a protocol is a pain in the ass... and as we&#039;re seeing with DNSSEC... people don&#039;t know how to properly rewrite the protocol to ensure security... we&#039;ll just end up with more headaches... unfortunately there aren&#039;t a lot of solutions for problems such as this that are inherent to the protocol itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right&#8230; re-writing a protocol is a pain in the ass&#8230; and as we&#8217;re seeing with DNSSEC&#8230; people don&#8217;t know how to properly rewrite the protocol to ensure security&#8230; we&#8217;ll just end up with more headaches&#8230; unfortunately there aren&#8217;t a lot of solutions for problems such as this that are inherent to the protocol itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LonerVamp</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2007/11/sector-review-black-ops-2007-dns-rebinding-attacks/comment-page-1/#comment-37405</link>
		<dc:creator>LonerVamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=423#comment-37405</guid>
		<description>Trying to add in security to DNS is akin to trying to write in security to SMTP. It&#039;s not gonna happen unless lots do it, and considering the overhead and trouble with DNSSEC, it&#039;s just not gonna happen any time soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trying to add in security to DNS is akin to trying to write in security to SMTP. It&#8217;s not gonna happen unless lots do it, and considering the overhead and trouble with DNSSEC, it&#8217;s just not gonna happen any time soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

