<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scan Your Way To Check Fraud.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.computerdefense.org/2008/02/scan-your-way-to-check-fraud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2008/02/scan-your-way-to-check-fraud/</link>
	<description>Sharing my thoughts with the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 02:58:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: graver</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2008/02/scan-your-way-to-check-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-43376</link>
		<dc:creator>graver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=448#comment-43376</guid>
		<description>PC Financial now allows you view PDFs of your cashed cheques when banking online. Go look through a web cache of a public computer and match up the info with one of your high quality scans. I don&#039;t know if the PDFs will have the resolution you mention above, but they will have all the bank numbers and a sweet signature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PC Financial now allows you view PDFs of your cashed cheques when banking online. Go look through a web cache of a public computer and match up the info with one of your high quality scans. I don&#8217;t know if the PDFs will have the resolution you mention above, but they will have all the bank numbers and a sweet signature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Reguly</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2008/02/scan-your-way-to-check-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-43189</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Reguly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=448#comment-43189</guid>
		<description>Maybe I&#039;m going crazy, because I don&#039;t grasp how people don&#039;t get this... I even sat down and ran it by someone this morning to make sure I wasn&#039;t going nuts. 

If I steal a check from you (by taking it out of the mailbox after you&#039;ve mailed it (mailbox fishing)) and take it to the bank, it&#039;s not in my name... I can&#039;t cash it. 

If I steal a check from you (same method) and take it home... I scan it, then I take a blank check associated with the same bank and place my name on the Payee field... In Photoshop I cut out the Payee field and overlay it on the original image... Because they are the same check they will align properly and you won&#039;t notice that they were edited... I submit this check online. It is cashed... In the bank, they would notice the edit because I couldn&#039;t do it as cleanly as I can when we&#039;re talking digital graphics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;m going crazy, because I don&#8217;t grasp how people don&#8217;t get this&#8230; I even sat down and ran it by someone this morning to make sure I wasn&#8217;t going nuts. </p>
<p>If I steal a check from you (by taking it out of the mailbox after you&#8217;ve mailed it (mailbox fishing)) and take it to the bank, it&#8217;s not in my name&#8230; I can&#8217;t cash it. </p>
<p>If I steal a check from you (same method) and take it home&#8230; I scan it, then I take a blank check associated with the same bank and place my name on the Payee field&#8230; In Photoshop I cut out the Payee field and overlay it on the original image&#8230; Because they are the same check they will align properly and you won&#8217;t notice that they were edited&#8230; I submit this check online. It is cashed&#8230; In the bank, they would notice the edit because I couldn&#8217;t do it as cleanly as I can when we&#8217;re talking digital graphics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2008/02/scan-your-way-to-check-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-43186</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=448#comment-43186</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think this is really all that different from the current non-electronic check model.  Physical checks are easy to forge as well.  The check receiver is always on the hook to prove legitimacy.  If there is a dispute, essentially they lose.

You&#039;re right that this potentially increases the avenues for attack, but not a lot more than a bad merchant forging checks and depositing them right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think this is really all that different from the current non-electronic check model.  Physical checks are easy to forge as well.  The check receiver is always on the hook to prove legitimacy.  If there is a dispute, essentially they lose.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right that this potentially increases the avenues for attack, but not a lot more than a bad merchant forging checks and depositing them right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liquidmatrix Security Digest &#187; Security Briefing: February 11th</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2008/02/scan-your-way-to-check-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-43130</link>
		<dc:creator>Liquidmatrix Security Digest &#187; Security Briefing: February 11th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=448#comment-43130</guid>
		<description>[...] Scan Your Way To Check Fraud. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scan Your Way To Check Fraud. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

