<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: XP SP3 and IE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.computerdefense.org/2008/05/xp-sp3-and-ie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2008/05/xp-sp3-and-ie/</link>
	<description>Sharing my thoughts with the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 04:08:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: david solomon</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2008/05/xp-sp3-and-ie/comment-page-1/#comment-77425</link>
		<dc:creator>david solomon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=481#comment-77425</guid>
		<description>I personally think that Windows XP sp2 verasion is much better than sp3 ...it does not lag...or cause any kind of installationm errors ! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally think that Windows XP sp2 verasion is much better than sp3 &#8230;it does not lag&#8230;or cause any kind of installationm errors !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
