<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Netbooks ARE Good Enough</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.computerdefense.org/2008/12/why-netbooks-are-good-enough/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2008/12/why-netbooks-are-good-enough/</link>
	<description>Sharing my thoughts with the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 02:58:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: netbook user</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2008/12/why-netbooks-are-good-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-195688</link>
		<dc:creator>netbook user</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 19:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=583#comment-195688</guid>
		<description>I code on a netbook on the train using VC2005.  When am at my desk I hook the netbook up to an external 22&quot; monitor, wireless keyboard and mouse and 2.1 subwoofer and it functions as my desktop machine running Win7.  I would say that the 1.6GHz atom performance is similar to a 1.8GHz non hyperthreaded Pentium 4; Intel GMA 950 seems similar in performance to an nVidia TNT2 graphics card.  The hard drive inside the netbook can be upgraded easily if u have a screwdriver.  I&#039;m using a 500gb internally which is enough for quite a lot of music and photos etc.  If you want a fast browser on an atom processor I recommend Chrome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I code on a netbook on the train using VC2005.  When am at my desk I hook the netbook up to an external 22&#8243; monitor, wireless keyboard and mouse and 2.1 subwoofer and it functions as my desktop machine running Win7.  I would say that the 1.6GHz atom performance is similar to a 1.8GHz non hyperthreaded Pentium 4; Intel GMA 950 seems similar in performance to an nVidia TNT2 graphics card.  The hard drive inside the netbook can be upgraded easily if u have a screwdriver.  I&#8217;m using a 500gb internally which is enough for quite a lot of music and photos etc.  If you want a fast browser on an atom processor I recommend Chrome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LonerVamp</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2008/12/why-netbooks-are-good-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-77498</link>
		<dc:creator>LonerVamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=583#comment-77498</guid>
		<description>If I traveled more, I would definitely pick up a Netbook because, yes, they are good enough! 
 
They are not good enough for every purpose, and I think people who diss on them are trying to use them for the wrong purposes.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I traveled more, I would definitely pick up a Netbook because, yes, they are good enough! </p>
<p>They are not good enough for every purpose, and I think people who diss on them are trying to use them for the wrong purposes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2008/12/why-netbooks-are-good-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-77500</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=583#comment-77500</guid>
		<description>I have a 901 and a Lenovo X61, and I&#039;m really in love with my X61.  With the small battery it weighs the same as the 901 but has short battery life, for a little more weight you get 5+ hours batter in the X61.   
 
Its got a Core 2 Duo 2.1Ghz CPU and a 250MB hard drive.  So plenty of power - its my primary development machine as well.  Perhaps the cost is a bit more than a netbook but you get a lot more.  People at work make fun of the small laptop (not sure why), but generally after using one for 30 minutes or so, most people want one.  Just a bit bigger and heavier than a netbook, but way lighter than some of the 15 and 17&quot; behemoths some of the others get. 
 
This is not to knock the netbooks, but more of a pro that small notebooks can be great.  
 
I recently had a chance to look at the Asus 1000 and wishing I held out for those to be stocked before getting my 901 as it has a real keyboard.  Oh well, since I do have the X61 the netbook has become more of a video player for the kids. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a 901 and a Lenovo X61, and I&#039;m really in love with my X61.  With the small battery it weighs the same as the 901 but has short battery life, for a little more weight you get 5+ hours batter in the X61.   </p>
<p>Its got a Core 2 Duo 2.1Ghz CPU and a 250MB hard drive.  So plenty of power &#8211; its my primary development machine as well.  Perhaps the cost is a bit more than a netbook but you get a lot more.  People at work make fun of the small laptop (not sure why), but generally after using one for 30 minutes or so, most people want one.  Just a bit bigger and heavier than a netbook, but way lighter than some of the 15 and 17&quot; behemoths some of the others get. </p>
<p>This is not to knock the netbooks, but more of a pro that small notebooks can be great.  </p>
<p>I recently had a chance to look at the Asus 1000 and wishing I held out for those to be stocked before getting my 901 as it has a real keyboard.  Oh well, since I do have the X61 the netbook has become more of a video player for the kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2008/12/why-netbooks-are-good-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-77501</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=583#comment-77501</guid>
		<description>And lets not forget how cheap they are! 
I love my eee, even though it&#039;s an older 7&quot;, it still runs firefox and does everything I need it to do, and for only a few hundred bucks! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And lets not forget how cheap they are!<br />
I love my eee, even though it&#039;s an older 7&quot;, it still runs firefox and does everything I need it to do, and for only a few hundred bucks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Book Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.computerdefense.org/2008/12/why-netbooks-are-good-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-77508</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Book Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=583#comment-77508</guid>
		<description>You are correct, they do have some uses, at first, i didn&#039;t like them bc i was looking at it as a traditional laptop, and i need more power but after thinking it over, it does make perfect travel bc as other poster said, im getting tired of carrying a larger laptop around and all i need it for is to surf and little bit of word processing when traveling. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct, they do have some uses, at first, i didn&#039;t like them bc i was looking at it as a traditional laptop, and i need more power but after thinking it over, it does make perfect travel bc as other poster said, im getting tired of carrying a larger laptop around and all i need it for is to surf and little bit of word processing when traveling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

